Abstract
This study compared two evaluation techniques, Usability Testing and Cognitive Walkthrough, in their ability to identify errors in aviation maintenance documentation. The techniques were evaluated to see how much unique information they each produced as well as the type of errors identified. Results showed that the techniques were complementary in their findings and both are recommended in the development of technical documentation.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Usability News |
| Volume | 7 |
| State | Published - Feb 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- aviation maintenance manuals
- technical documentation
Disciplines
- Aviation
- Maintenance Technology