A Theoretical Model of Flow Disruptions for the Anesthesia Team During Cardiovascular Surgery (IN PRESS), Post Author Corrections July 3, 2017

Albert Boquet, Tara Cohen, Fawaaz Diljohn, Jennifer Cabrera, Scott Reeves, Scott Shappell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives

This investigation explores flow disruptions observed during cardiothoracic surgery and how they serve to disconnect anesthesia providers from their primary task. We can improve our understanding of this disengagement by exploring what we call the error space or the accumulated time required to resolve disruptions.

Methods

Trained human factors students observed 10 cardiac procedures for disruptions impacting the anesthesia team and recorded the time required to resolve these events. Observations were classified using a human factors taxonomy.

Results

Of 301 disruptions observed, interruptions (e.g., those events related to alerts, distractions, searching activity, spilling/dropping, teaching moment, and task deviations) accounted for the greatest frequency of events (39.20%). The average amount of time needed for each disruption to be resolved was 48 seconds. Across 49.87 hours of observation, more than 4 hours were spent resolving disruptions to the anesthesia team's work flow.

Conclusions

By defining a calculable error space associated with these disruptions, this research provides a conceptual metric that can serve in the identification and design of targeted interventions. This method serves as a proactive approach for recognizing systemic threats, affording healthcare workers the opportunity to mitigate the development and incidence of preventable errors precedently.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of Patient Safety
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2017

Keywords

  • anesthesia team
  • anesthesiology
  • cardiovascular surgery
  • error space
  • flow disruptions
  • human factors
  • situation awareness

Disciplines

  • Anesthesiology
  • Cardiology
  • Surgery

Cite this