Comparison of SA Measurement Techniques in a Human-Robot Team Task

Joseph R. Keebler; David Schuster; Florian Jentsch; Jorge Zuniga

doi:10.1177/1071181312561343

Comparison of SA Measurement Techniques in a Human-Robot Team Task

Joseph R. Keebler, David Schuster, Florian Jentsch, Jorge Zuniga

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Increasingly intelligent and capable robots may lead to human-robot interaction characterized by close collaboration with robots as team members rather than remotely manipulated tools. In this mode of operation, it is important that robot team members contribute to, rather than limit, the situation awareness (SA) of soldiers. An exploratory study was conducted in which the effects of individual differences and mission factors on three measures of SA were compared. The Situational Awareness Rating Technique (SART) was the best metric for capturing elements of SA that were useful in mission performance, although the results suggest that other measures should not be disregarded. Practical implications for the use of SA metrics in human-robot teams are discussed.

Original language	American English
Journal	Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Volume	56
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561343
State	Published - Sep 2012
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

teams
robots
artificial intelligence
situational awareness

Disciplines

Other Psychology

Access to Document

10.1177/1071181312561343License: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{873bb570198c4067b74b32ffbcf06494,

title = "Comparison of SA Measurement Techniques in a Human-Robot Team Task",

abstract = " Increasingly intelligent and capable robots may lead to human-robot interaction characterized by close collaboration with robots as team members rather than remotely manipulated tools. In this mode of operation, it is important that robot team members contribute to, rather than limit, the situation awareness (SA) of soldiers. An exploratory study was conducted in which the effects of individual differences and mission factors on three measures of SA were compared. The Situational Awareness Rating Technique (SART) was the best metric for capturing elements of SA that were useful in mission performance, although the results suggest that other measures should not be disregarded. Practical implications for the use of SA metrics in human-robot teams are discussed. ",

keywords = "teams, robots, artificial intelligence, situational awareness",

author = "Keebler, {Joseph R.} and David Schuster and Florian Jentsch and Jorge Zuniga",

year = "2012",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1177/1071181312561343",

language = "American English",

volume = "56",

journal = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of SA Measurement Techniques in a Human-Robot Team Task

AU - Keebler, Joseph R.

AU - Schuster, David

AU - Jentsch, Florian

AU - Zuniga, Jorge

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Increasingly intelligent and capable robots may lead to human-robot interaction characterized by close collaboration with robots as team members rather than remotely manipulated tools. In this mode of operation, it is important that robot team members contribute to, rather than limit, the situation awareness (SA) of soldiers. An exploratory study was conducted in which the effects of individual differences and mission factors on three measures of SA were compared. The Situational Awareness Rating Technique (SART) was the best metric for capturing elements of SA that were useful in mission performance, although the results suggest that other measures should not be disregarded. Practical implications for the use of SA metrics in human-robot teams are discussed.

AB - Increasingly intelligent and capable robots may lead to human-robot interaction characterized by close collaboration with robots as team members rather than remotely manipulated tools. In this mode of operation, it is important that robot team members contribute to, rather than limit, the situation awareness (SA) of soldiers. An exploratory study was conducted in which the effects of individual differences and mission factors on three measures of SA were compared. The Situational Awareness Rating Technique (SART) was the best metric for capturing elements of SA that were useful in mission performance, although the results suggest that other measures should not be disregarded. Practical implications for the use of SA metrics in human-robot teams are discussed.

KW - teams

KW - robots

KW - artificial intelligence

KW - situational awareness

U2 - 10.1177/1071181312561343

DO - 10.1177/1071181312561343

M3 - Article

VL - 56

JO - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting

JF - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting

ER -