Final Report: A Comparison of Three Evaluative Techniques for Validating Maintenance Documentation

Alex Chaparro, Bonnie Rogers, Chris Hambllin, Barbara Chaparro

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Abstract

Surveys and interviews reveal that general aviation manufacturers rely on user[s] to identify problems in maintenance documentation with corrections typically initiated in response to users-reported problems found in the manual;. This investigation compares techniques that manufacturers can use to improve the quality of the maintenance documentation developed by technical writing groups. The techniques, User Performance and Cognitive Walkthrough, were used to identify problems in aircraft maintenance documentation.

Original languageAmerican English
Place of PublicationWashington, DC
StatePublished - Feb 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • error
  • human factors
  • maintenance manuals
  • general aviation

Disciplines

  • Aviation Safety and Security

Cite this