Abstract
The objectives of this study were to identify the frequency and nature of flow disruptions in the operating room with respect to three cardiac surgical team members: anaesthetists; circulating nurses; and perfusionists. Data collected from 15 cases and coded using a human factors taxonomy identified 878 disruptions. Significant differences were identified in frequency relative to discipline type. Circulating nurses experienced more coordination disruptions (v2 (2, N = 110) = 7.136, p < 0.028) and interruptions (v2 (2, N = 427) = 29.743, p = 0.001) than anaesthetists and perfusionists, whereas anaesthetists and perfusionists experienced more layout issues than circulating nurses (v2 (2, N = 153) = 48.558, p = 0.001). Time to resolve disruptions also varied among disciplines (k (12, 878) = 5.186, p = 0.000). Although most investigations take a one-size fits all approach in addressing disruptions to flow, this study demonstrates that targeted interventions must focus on differences with respect to individual role.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Journal | Anaesthesia |
Volume | 71 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2016 |
Keywords
- quality measures in patient care
- root cause analysis
- essential elements
- operating room disruptions
- cardiovascular surgery
Disciplines
- Medicine and Health Sciences
- Surgery