Review of Combat Identification Training: Technologies, Metrics, and Individual Differences

Joseph R. Keebler; Dustin C. Smith; Brady Patzer; John P. Plummer; Florian Jentsch; Evan Palmer

doi:10.1177/1541931215591392

Review of Combat Identification Training: Technologies, Metrics, and Individual Differences

Joseph R. Keebler, Dustin C. Smith, Brady Patzer, John P. Plummer, Florian Jentsch, Evan Palmer

Human Factors & Behavioral Neurobiology

Research output: Contribution to conference › Presentation

Abstract

Combat identification (CID) has been studied throughout the 20th and into the 21st century, with a renewed interest in the topic in the past few decades. CID research has demonstrated that an emerging set of technologies could potentially mitigate some of the negative battlefield outcomes of failures in CID, including high rates of fratricide due to friendly fire. This paper discusses major CID research and provides an update on previous CID research by the authors. We review training technologies, effective measurement tools in this research, and important individual differences to consider for others researching training outcomes in relation to learning to differentiate between highly similar combat vehicles.

Original language	American English
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591392
State	Published - 2015
Event	Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting - Los Angeles, CA Duration: Jan 1 2015 → …

Conference

Conference	Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting
Period	1/1/15 → …

Keywords

training

Disciplines

Other Psychology

Access to Document

10.1177/1541931215591392License: Unspecified

Cite this

@conference{a8b7bce50c1e4b05a3a441a51776df9b,

title = "Review of Combat Identification Training: Technologies, Metrics, and Individual Differences",

abstract = " Combat identification (CID) has been studied throughout the 20th and into the 21st century, with a renewed interest in the topic in the past few decades. CID research has demonstrated that an emerging set of technologies could potentially mitigate some of the negative battlefield outcomes of failures in CID, including high rates of fratricide due to friendly fire. This paper discusses major CID research and provides an update on previous CID research by the authors. We review training technologies, effective measurement tools in this research, and important individual differences to consider for others researching training outcomes in relation to learning to differentiate between highly similar combat vehicles.",

keywords = "training",

author = "Keebler, {Joseph R.} and Smith, {Dustin C.} and Brady Patzer and Plummer, {John P.} and Florian Jentsch and Evan Palmer",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1177/1541931215591392",

language = "American English",

note = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting ; Conference date: 01-01-2015",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Review of Combat Identification Training: Technologies, Metrics, and Individual Differences

AU - Keebler, Joseph R.

AU - Smith, Dustin C.

AU - Patzer, Brady

AU - Plummer, John P.

AU - Jentsch, Florian

AU - Palmer, Evan

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Combat identification (CID) has been studied throughout the 20th and into the 21st century, with a renewed interest in the topic in the past few decades. CID research has demonstrated that an emerging set of technologies could potentially mitigate some of the negative battlefield outcomes of failures in CID, including high rates of fratricide due to friendly fire. This paper discusses major CID research and provides an update on previous CID research by the authors. We review training technologies, effective measurement tools in this research, and important individual differences to consider for others researching training outcomes in relation to learning to differentiate between highly similar combat vehicles.

AB - Combat identification (CID) has been studied throughout the 20th and into the 21st century, with a renewed interest in the topic in the past few decades. CID research has demonstrated that an emerging set of technologies could potentially mitigate some of the negative battlefield outcomes of failures in CID, including high rates of fratricide due to friendly fire. This paper discusses major CID research and provides an update on previous CID research by the authors. We review training technologies, effective measurement tools in this research, and important individual differences to consider for others researching training outcomes in relation to learning to differentiate between highly similar combat vehicles.

KW - training

U2 - 10.1177/1541931215591392

DO - 10.1177/1541931215591392

M3 - Presentation

T2 - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting

Y2 - 1 January 2015

ER -